In Focus: India’s Israel Strategy in a Fracturing World
Source: Ministry of External Affairs
As the phenomenal AI Impact Summit came to a close last week in New Delhi, India’s geopolitical momentum accelerated at top gear with both incoming and outgoing visits scheduled. In line with this, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to Israel unfolded with all the familiar elements of high symbolism. There were warm embraces with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, evocative invocations of ancient trade routes linking the Mediterranean to the Indian Ocean, and a historic address to the Knesset that seamlessly wove together “Am Yisrael Chai” and “Jai Hind.” On the surface, the visit appeared to reaffirm a well-rehearsed narrative of civilisational affinity, shared histories of partition and independence, and a common struggle against extremism.
But for those accustomed to reading diplomacy beyond its optics, the real story lies elsewhere. It resides not in the language of public diplomacy, but in the colder realities of a world that is fragmenting economically, hardening geopolitically, and edging toward a regional conflict that could reshape global alignments. This visit was not merely about symbolism; it was about preparation. While media coverage has focused on the monetary size of defence deals or the domestic political theatre within Israel, the deeper narrative is about India’s quiet but deliberate recalibration of its external strategy. What New Delhi is executing is not a single alignment, but a sophisticated hedging strategy—one that seeks to reduce exposure to superpower volatility by building layered, resilient partnerships. The timing of the visit is instructive. It comes amid an increasingly unpredictable American policy environment, one that has swung between strategic warmth and sharp economic coercion, including punitive tariffs that have rattled Indian exporters. In response, India is no longer placing its bets on any single anchor. Instead, it is constructing a lattice of relationships designed to absorb shocks, distribute risk, and preserve strategic autonomy.
The Military-Industrial Turn
The most immediate subtext of this visit is the intensifying risk of a confrontation between the United States and Iran. For decades, India has carefully balanced its relationships with both Jerusalem and Tehran. But by 2026, that balancing act has become harder to sustain. The deployment of advanced American fighter aircraft to Israel, coupled with increasingly stark rhetoric from regional capitals, has created a sense that the Middle East is operating under a tightening clock.
India’s response has been neither rhetorical nor reactive. Instead, New Delhi is quietly reworking the foundations of its defence posture. The urgency of this shift can be traced back to the events of May 2025, internally referred to as “Operation Sindoor”, which was the first time that India faced coordinated drone and missile attacks. That episode served as a strategic wake-up call. What followed was a recalibration now taking shape as “Mission Sudarshan,” a renewed doctrine of active deterrence. Israeli systems, ranging from laser-based air defence to advanced interceptors and precision strike capabilities, form a critical part of this response. But the significance of the India–Israel defence relationship lies less in the hardware itself and more in the terms of engagement.
Unlike traditional arms procurement, New Delhi has placed an uncompromising emphasis on joint development and access to intellectual property. This insistence is not accidental. It reflects hard-earned lessons from past crises and a deep awareness of how quickly supply chains and access can become politicised. The objective is clear: India is not merely acquiring capabilities; it is seeking technological sovereignty—systems that cannot be constrained, delayed, or disabled by third-party pressures. This approach is rooted in memory as much as strategy. Policymakers in Delhi have not forgotten Israel’s decision during the Kargil conflict to supply critical equipment when others hesitated. In today’s environment, where Washington’s regional priorities appear increasingly fluid, that reliability carries renewed weight.
Corridors of Trade, Data, Security, and Strategic Pauses
Beyond defence, the visit reflects a broader economic recalibration underway in New Delhi. The global trading system is fraying, and recent tariff shocks have underscored the risks of overdependence on any single consumer market. India’s answer has been a decisive pivot toward partnerships with technologically capable middle powers. Israel occupies a pivotal place in this strategy, particularly as a gateway to Europe through the India–Middle East–Europe Economic Corridor. While public discourse has focused on ports, railways, and logistics, the more consequential shift may be digital. Undersea data cables linking India to Europe via Israel are quietly reshaping the geography of global data flows, offering secure alternatives to congested or vulnerable routes, with Google at the forefront of executing projects by 2026.
By aligning India’s digital public infrastructure with Israeli cyber and data capabilities, New Delhi is helping shape a trusted digital backbone for emerging markets. This is not just about efficiency; it is about control, resilience, and strategic geography in an era where data has become as critical as energy. The physical dimension of this corridor is equally strategic. As maritime chokepoints face growing disruption risks, overland routes through stable partners offer a degree of insulation. The logic behind recent budgetary choices becomes clearer in this light: India is consciously privileging routes and partnerships that reduce exposure to geopolitical shocks.
Perhaps the most debated decision of early 2026 has been India’s effective pause on investment in Iran’s Chabahar Port. Once envisioned as India’s gateway to Central Asia, Chabahar has become a casualty of regional volatility and tightening sanctions. The decision to step back reflects not abandonment, but realism. With the prospect of conflict looming and traditional corridors increasingly constrained, New Delhi has opted to conserve capital and flexibility. The shift toward Mediterranean-linked routes is a recognition that, for now, India’s economic future lies along more stable and predictable axes. This realignment is reinforced by emerging security frameworks in the Eastern Mediterranean, where India has begun to play a more visible role. For the first time in recent history, New Delhi is extending its strategic footprint well beyond its immediate neighbourhood, an indication of growing confidence, ambition, and a geopolitical heft reflective of the soon-to-be ‘third-largest economy’.
From Non-Alignment to Strategic Engineering
The domestic political turbulence within Israel adds complexity to the bilateral relationship, but India has navigated it with notable discipline. Rather than personalising ties, New Delhi has focused on institutionalising cooperation through binding agreements on investment, labour mobility, and technology. These frameworks are designed to endure beyond individual leaders or electoral cycles. The agreement to deploy tens of thousands of skilled Indian workers to Israel exemplifies this approach. It addresses immediate labour shortages while embedding India more deeply into Israel’s economic ecosystem, a mutually reinforcing arrangement with long-term strategic dividends.
As 2026 unfolds, with India assuming greater leadership roles on the global stage and the international system bracing for further shocks, the significance of this visit becomes unmistakable. What we are witnessing is not the abandonment of non-alignment, but its evolution into something more muscular and pragmatic. India today is not choosing sides in a decaying global order. It is actively shaping a polycentric one, leveraging innovation, infrastructure, and institutional partnerships to hedge against uncertainty across multiple fronts. The real story of the India–Israel bilateral lies not in the photo opportunities, but in this quiet, methodical preparation for a world in flux. It is statecraft designed less for today’s headlines and more for tomorrow’s balance of power, deliberate, unsentimental, and largely invisible by design.
Top Stories of the Week
MHA Unveils ‘PRAHAAR’, India’s First National Counter-Terrorism Policy
The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has launched ‘PRAHAAR’, India’s first National Counter-Terrorism Policy and Strategy, establishing a comprehensive national framework to address evolving threats, including cross-border terrorism, drone-based attacks, cyberterrorism, and terror financing. The policy formalises India’s zero-tolerance approach and introduces a structured strategy centred on prevention, swift response, capacity-building, counter-radicalisation, and international cooperation.
PRAHAAR emphasises intelligence-led operations, enhanced inter-agency coordination, and strengthened roles for institutions such as the Multi-Agency Centre and National Investigation Agency. It also prioritises protection of critical infrastructure, improved border surveillance, and modernisation of security forces to counter emerging technology-enabled threats. Adopting a whole-of-government and whole-of-society approach, the policy integrates law enforcement, intelligence agencies, and community engagement to dismantle terror ecosystems. The framework positions prevention, preparedness, and institutional coordination as central to strengthening India’s long-term national security and resilience against evolving terrorism threats.
MeitY Sets Up High-Level Panel to Strengthen and Future-Proof DigiLocker Framework
The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) has constituted a high-level committee to review and strengthen the regulatory framework governing DigiLocker, the Government of India’s flagship digital document wallet. In an official statement, MeitY confirmed that the panel will be chaired by former MeitY Secretary Ajay Sawhney and tasked with examining the existing rules and operational guidelines that underpin the platform.
The committee will assess whether the current framework aligns with India’s evolving legal ecosystem, as well as with emerging technologies that are rapidly reshaping digital governance. Beyond reviewing the rules, the panel has also been asked to chart a comprehensive roadmap for the future expansion of DigiLocker. According to MeitY, this roadmap will explore initiatives such as Entity Locker Services, broader ecosystem participation, and even the potential commercialisation of certain services offered through the platform. The committee is expected to include legal experts, technology specialists, and industry representatives to ensure a well-rounded and forward-looking approach to reform.
A Few Good Reads
Huzefa Tavawalla and Jvalita Krishan argue that ambiguities between India’s FDI policy, IN-SPACe regulations, and DST guidelines risk imposing unintended investment constraints on downstream geospatial data businesses despite reforms aimed at liberalisation.
Ajit Ranade writes that India is settling into a hybrid equilibrium where UPI is remaking the flow of transactions, but the stock of cash, shaped by informality, trust, enforcement, welfare design and electoral politics, remains entrenched.
Vinayak Chatterjee emphasises that a credible PPP revival requires realistic risk allocation, built-in renegotiation frameworks and credible contracts, positioning PPPs as the organising principle of India’s next infrastructure push.
Sneha Bhagat and Aakash Kumar call Pax Silica the framework where efforts converge into a cohesive allied bloc, securing India a seat at the table in a new economic security consensus.
VS Seshadri states that WTO rules should explicitly accommodate supply-chain risk mitigation and sourcing diversification, balancing effective rules with policy space for industrialisation.