In Focus: Why Care Infrastructure May Be India’s Next Growth Engine
India’s demographic debate is changing, and not in the direction most expected.
For decades, policymakers worried about population growth. Today, the concern is the opposite. India’s Total Fertility Rate has fallen below the replacement level of 2.1, joining a growing list of countries grappling with declining fertility. Political leaders in several states have begun advocating larger families, while experts warn of long-term consequences. Yet this emerging discourse risks focusing on symptoms rather than causes.
The real question is not whether Indians are having enough children. It is whether India is building the institutions required for a society in profound demographic transition, one that must simultaneously prepare for an ageing population, changing family structures, rising female workforce participation, and evolving labour markets. Above all, it is a story about care.
The End of a Single Story
For nearly three decades, India’s demographic advantage was viewed through one lens: a large and growing working-age population. That dividend shaped economic projections and development strategies. India was expected to benefit from a youthful workforce capable of driving consumption, innovation and growth.
That opportunity remains real. But demographic transitions do not announce themselves, rather they unfold gradually until a tipping point is reached, and India has already crossed one.
Fertility rates have fallen across most states. Southern states like Kerala and Tamil Nadu now have fertility levels comparable to developed economies. Urban India is seeing smaller families, delayed marriages and deferred parenthood, while life expectancy continues to rise. The result is a demographic profile that is becoming simultaneously older and more complex. India must now care for hundreds of millions of children and hundreds of millions of elderly citizens at the same time. That demands a fundamentally different policy response than the one currently on offer.
The Invisible Infrastructure we cannot see
When governments discuss infrastructure, we all think of roads, railways, airports and digital networks. There is another form that remains largely invisible despite underpinning the entire economy: care.
Historically, Indian society relied on informal family structures to provide it. That model is now under significant strain. Urbanisation has separated families geographically. Nuclear households have replaced joint families. Migration has become essential for economic mobility. Female educational attainment and workforce aspirations have risen sharply. Yet the burden of care continues to fall disproportionately on women, who spend, on average, 289 minutes per day on unpaid domestic and care work compared to 88 minutes for men. Participation rates tell the same story: over 92% of women aged 15 to 59 engage in unpaid domestic work, compared to just 30% of men.
This is not simply a social challenge. It is a systemic time tax, what researchers call the “care penalty”. It limits women’s access to paid employment, education, and economic mobility. Urban female labour force participation has consequently stagnated at 20 to 25% for nearly two decades, among the lowest for any major economy at India’s stage of development.
The Falling Fertility Rate
Much of the current fertility debate assumes lower birth rates reflect changing preferences. The reality is more structural.
Fertility decisions are closely linked to the cost and availability of caregiving. When childcare is inaccessible or expensive, families postpone having children. When eldercare falls entirely on working-age adults, family formation changes. When housing, education and healthcare costs rise faster than incomes, family size naturally declines. As discussed in the recently released working paper on the care economy, the evidence from India is striking: urban women want, on average, 0.4 more children than they actually have, compared to just 0.1 in rural areas. That gap is not a preference gap. It is a care infrastructure gap.
This helps explain why fertility incentives alone produce limited results. Japan, South Korea, Singapore and China have all experimented with pro-natalist policies with little lasting effect. People do not make family decisions based solely on financial incentives but also based on confidence that they can raise children without sacrificing careers, that ageing parents will be supported, that society has built systems to make family life sustainable.
India should absorb these lessons before demographic anxiety drives policy choices.
Care as Economic Strategy
The recently released EAC-PM working paper “Re-imagining the Care Economy: From Private Burden to Social and Economic Infrastructure” offers an important corrective. Rather than viewing care as welfare expenditure, it frames care as productive economic infrastructure, and the numbers make the case compellingly.
India will need 31 to 38 million formal care workers by 2050, spanning childcare, eldercare and long-term support. Investments of just 2% of GDP in the health and care sector are estimated to generate 11 million jobs, the majority going to women. Meanwhile, urban female labour force participation, especially depressed in households with young children, could rise significantly with accessible, affordable childcare.
Care work is labour-intensive, geographically distributed and resistant to automation. Most importantly, it converts unpaid labour, overwhelmingly performed by women, into recognised economic activity. India’s next wave of employment generation may come not only from manufacturing plants and digital platforms, but from childcare centres, home-care services, assisted-living facilities and community caregiving networks. The care economy can therefore function as both a domestic growth engine and, given the global shortage of trained caregivers, an export opportunity as well.
Looking Forward
Countries that navigate demographic transition successfully build systems in advance rather than reacting to crisis. Germany and the Nordic countries developed care infrastructure that sustained workforce participation across generations. Japan is investing in community-based eldercare to cope with rapid ageing. What these countries share is a common insight: care is not a private family problem. It is public infrastructure.
India has distinct advantages to build on: a large workforce, a rapidly expanding digital ecosystem, growing healthcare capabilities and deep experience in large-scale public service delivery. With the right framework, India could become a global hub for caregiver training and certification, much as Indian nurses, doctors and technology professionals serve global markets today.
But the domestic architecture must come first. That means embedding childcare norms within urban master plans, including repurposing underenrolled government schools as care facilities. It means reforming the current maternity-centric leave structure, which concentrates costs on employers and inadvertently discourages the hiring of women, toward gender-neutral shared parental leave. It means creating financing mechanisms, public funds, PPP concession agreements, and CSR channels, that treat care infrastructure the way India treats roads and ports: as a public good that cannot be left to households alone.
The country’s future prosperity will depend less on whether fertility rises marginally above or below replacement levels, and more on whether its institutions evolve to support people across the full arc of their lives.
India’s demographic dividend is not ending. It is evolving. The question is whether the country is ready for what comes next.
Top Stories of the Week
PMRC Scheme 2026 Opens Applications to Attract Global Indian Research Talent
The Ministry of Education has opened applications for the Prime Minister Research Chair (PMRC) Scheme 2026, a flagship initiative aimed at bringing Indian-origin researchers, scientists, and technology professionals working abroad to India’s leading academic and research institutions. The programme seeks to strengthen India’s research ecosystem in 13 priority areas, including artificial intelligence, quantum computing, semiconductors, cybersecurity, biotechnology, healthcare, space and defence, energy, climate change, and advanced materials.
The scheme offers three categories: Young Research Fellows, Senior Research Fellows, and Research Chairs based on experience and research achievements. Selected candidates will receive funding support, access to advanced laboratories, and opportunities to collaborate with top Indian institutions for up to five years (2026–27 to 2030–31). Eligible applicants include Indian nationals abroad, OCI cardholders, and Persons of Indian Origin. Seven institutions, including IIT Delhi, IIT Bombay, IIT Madras, IIT Hyderabad, IIT Kanpur, IIT (ISM) Dhanbad, and IISc Bengaluru, have been identified as lead host institutions. Applications are open until 15 July 2026.
MP Proposes 20 Trees for Every Tree Cut
The Madhya Pradesh government has submitted the draft Tree Translocation Policy-2026 before the High Court, proposing stricter environmental safeguards for infrastructure and development projects. A central feature of the draft is the ‘20-for-1’ formula, under which agencies undertaking projects would be required to plant 20 new trees for every tree felled. It seeks to minimise tree cutting by giving priority to the transplantation of mature trees wherever feasible. Tree felling would be treated as a last resort, with compensatory plantation requirements becoming significantly more stringent than existing norms.
The draft policy has been placed before the MP High Court and is presently subject to judicial review. By emphasising tree translocation and enhanced compensatory afforestation, the state government aims to strike a balance between infrastructure development and ecological conservation.
A Few Good Reads
Shashi Tharoor dissects the diplomatic chasm between Washington and Tehran. He explores why diplomacy has failed so far, delving into realpolitik and historical rivalries between the two countries.
Purushraj Patnaik explores the contrasts between India’s lack of consumer protection laws for AI emotional dependence and the rigorous guardrails recently enacted by the European Union, the United States, and China.
Ita Mehrotra writes about graphic novelist Joe Sacco’s book ‘The Once and Future Riots’, which investigates the Muzaffarnagar riots of 2013. The publishing house Penguin India recently flagged issues and halted the distribution of the book in the country.
Manoj Joshi analyzes India’s border strategy with China. He highlights how India’s successful use of bilateral mechanisms has helped manage boundary disputes that have worsened since the 2020 Chinese blockades and troop deployments.